1,721,168 research outputs found

    Spring Meeting of Council, May 15-17, 1985 Scottsdale, Arizona, Minutes of Meeting

    Get PDF
    https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_assoc/2005/thumbnail.jp

    Spring Meeting of Council, Phoenix, Arizona, May 11-13, 1981

    Get PDF
    https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_assoc/2000/thumbnail.jp

    CPA Client Bulletin, January 1990

    Get PDF
    https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_news/4564/thumbnail.jp

    Legislative Report, Volume 12, Number 3, March 1979

    Get PDF
    https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_news/4877/thumbnail.jp

    CPA Client Bulletin, July 1997

    Get PDF
    https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_news/4654/thumbnail.jp

    Financial Manager\u27s Report, March 1995

    Get PDF
    https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_news/2883/thumbnail.jp

    20150709: Department of Engineering, 2008

    Get PDF
    These items include materials from Engineering at Marshall University from 2008. Items were received in 2015 and include notable materials from or about the History of Engineering Department at Marshall University among other support and presentations about Engineering at Marshall and enrollment information. This is not an exhaustive list. Please download the finding aid for a full list of contents

    Who or what was the inspiration for choosing your current course of study?

    Get PDF
    Award winning student essay. This essay won the Student Writing Award Scheme via the HE Academy Subject Network for Information and Computer Sciences

    Agent-Based Models and Simulations in Economics and Social Sciences: from conceptual exploration to distinct ways of experimenting

    Get PDF
    Now that complex Agent-Based Models and computer simulations spread over economics and social sciences - as in most sciences of complex systems -, epistemological puzzles (re)emerge. We introduce new epistemological tools so as to show to what precise extent each author is right when he focuses on some empirical, instrumental or conceptual significance of his model or simulation. By distinguishing between models and simulations, between types of models, between types of computer simulations and between types of empiricity, section 2 gives conceptual tools to explain the rationale of the diverse epistemological positions presented in section 1. Finally, we claim that a careful attention to the real multiplicity of denotational powers of symbols at stake and then to the implicit routes of references operated by models and computer simulations is necessary to determine, in each case, the proper epistemic status and credibility of a given model and/or simulation
    corecore